(no subject)
May. 27th, 2019 11:44 pmpokes my head up from the depths of hell (Mumbai summer) to talk about a take I saw...months back.
I was scrolling through fanacademia twitter (as you do) and came across the idea that writing Slavery AUs is racist, which admittedly isn't that far-fetched but then I spent a lot of time feeling intensely guilty about being into slavefic, and then I was like
- why is it racist to engage with an idea, even if you're getting off on it?
- is it actually racist or is it that just people trying to shut down certain kinds of fan creativity
-why should I be listening to them, instead of the more important party in this conversation, namely my horny cortex?
- is all engagement racist or are there exceptions
- why are we privileging vanilla (not E rated for sexual content, in this case) content over content that gets people off?
[if you have answers to these questions + other reasons why Slavery AUs (esp sex slave AUs) are Good Actually feel free to lmk because I do want arguments to fall back on]
and then I realized at some point down the line that I simply disagreed with the idea that the progressiveness of fandom could be measured in terms of the identities of the people we wrote about instead of, you know, OUR engagement with the themes and narratives and characters and spaces and each other, and the myopic focus on 'there are x number of fanfics about poc in this fandom' was actually, like, holding us back from having a conversation about how progressiveness in fandom looks different from progressiveness in mainstream media/mass media, while also being the kinda question that was actively detrimental to ME as a PoC In Fandom who makes content, and is it more progressive of me to make content about anime by that metric? or is progressiveness more about...other things. Like themes! [read this article for more]
edit: which is not to say that writing about marginalized characters ISN'T important, it's just not always the most important thing or the best measure of these things
I was scrolling through fanacademia twitter (as you do) and came across the idea that writing Slavery AUs is racist, which admittedly isn't that far-fetched but then I spent a lot of time feeling intensely guilty about being into slavefic, and then I was like
- why is it racist to engage with an idea, even if you're getting off on it?
- is it actually racist or is it that just people trying to shut down certain kinds of fan creativity
-
- is all engagement racist or are there exceptions
- why are we privileging vanilla (not E rated for sexual content, in this case) content over content that gets people off?
[if you have answers to these questions + other reasons why Slavery AUs (esp sex slave AUs) are Good Actually feel free to lmk because I do want arguments to fall back on]
and then I realized at some point down the line that I simply disagreed with the idea that the progressiveness of fandom could be measured in terms of the identities of the people we wrote about instead of, you know, OUR engagement with the themes and narratives and characters and spaces and each other, and the myopic focus on 'there are x number of fanfics about poc in this fandom' was actually, like, holding us back from having a conversation about how progressiveness in fandom looks different from progressiveness in mainstream media/mass media, while also being the kinda question that was actively detrimental to ME as a PoC In Fandom who makes content, and is it more progressive of me to make content about anime by that metric? or is progressiveness more about...other things. Like themes! [read this article for more]
edit: which is not to say that writing about marginalized characters ISN'T important, it's just not always the most important thing or the best measure of these things
no subject
Date: 2019-05-27 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-05-27 08:33 pm (UTC)I would also say that "slavery" as an entire concept doesn't necessarily have universal themes to it. There are many many broad themes which are easily conceptualized as being indicative of slavery and expected within such a system... but not necessarily anything completely universal. And so in a certain sense, it's not always apt to assume that any given interpretation of slavery is a reflection of (American) black slavery, per se. Although I guess your mileage may vary depending how your AU is structured, exactly, and whether it is explicitely supposed to be identifiably comparable to American black slavery.
Also why is it reasonably okay for Proper authors and filmmakers and storytellers to write historical fiction set in slave eras and societies but not fanfic authors? Hmm, seems like your generic wank over the idea that fanfiction is illegitimate and has no literary, analytical, subservise, or transformative merit. And also the automatic assumption that anyone writing slavery content would be in a position to perpetuate racism rather than be a subject of it has the faint odor of "fans are (cis) straight white girls."